In honor of 25 years of Risking Connection®, this series explores the heart of the Risking Connection Change Model: R.I.C.H. relationships – those that exemplify Respect, Information, Connection, and Hope – and the real challenges of living them out. These are the areas where we struggle, stumble, and sometimes become less than helpful to our clients and each other.
In the final post of this series we turn to Hope.
Hope is the foundation on which all the other qualities rest. In the dictionary hope is defined as: “to cherish a desire with anticipation;” “to desire with expectation of obtainment;” and “the feeling that what is wanted can be had or that events will turn out for the best.” A RICH relationship in itself creates hope, independently of the external reality.
It is the treater’s responsibility to take care of him/herself and do whatever is needed to fight vicarious trauma in order to maintain hope. Their work is to “Hold onto a vision of the survivor’s potential future self,” and to “serve as trustees for the survivor’s future possibilities.” (RC pp.15-16) The treater is at their best when they can envision clearly the future client: healed, living a productive life. The treater must maintain the tension between seeing that vision of the client’s potential and also seeing the current reality of the client.
The authors ask us to direct our attention to evidence of hope and resiliency in our client’s stories. When presenting or discussing a case, it's important to talk about strengths in a real – rather than pro forma – way. They also point out that hope is fueled by compassion for our clients. If we understand the adaptive nature of their symptoms, we feel less exasperated and less personally attacked when issues arise. In other words, having a theory is a road map that helps you understand the behavior and plan your next treatment intervention. It creates hope that counteracts the bewilderment and discouragement we often feel in the face of extreme behaviors.
What is the meaning we ascribe to our client’s behaviors?
A case example: When Aisha ran away and became involved in dangerous situations, staff person Louis reacted: “How can she be so stupid! We have explained a thousand times that she is putting herself at risk. In fact, I just had a great talk with her last night about this! I told her how worried I was about her when she put herself in such danger. She told me she understood and would not run away again, and she thanked me for spending time with her. I guess she was just manipulating me to be able to stay up longer. She doesn’t care about me or anyone else. She doesn’t even want to get better. She’ll probably end up being kicked out of here just like our last two clients. Sometimes I wonder why we even bother.”
Another staff, Mario, was also affected by Aisha’s running away. His words reframe the behavior, though, and he then shifts to a stance of curiosity: “I am so scared for Aisha. She still doesn’t value herself enough to keep herself safe. And we haven’t yet been able to teach her an alternative to running, or to make her safe enough to try it. I wonder if we set up a place on grounds where she could run and stay until she calmed down enough to come back, if that would help her? And when I think of it, I realize that Aisha has been forming some close connections with both me and Louis. I wonder if that is scary to her, especially since we are guys? I’m going to talk to Tracy, her therapist, about that, and bring it to team. I don’t know what we should do differently, but maybe there is something. Aisha is so bright and has so much spunk. I know she has a great future if we can just find a way to get her there.”
See the contrast? Which do you think is more likely to be helpful to and respectful of the client and her needs?
The enemy of hope is vicarious traumatization (VT). Since it is the treater’s responsibility to maintain hope, it is essential that we combat this aspect of VT specifically. Some strategies, largely taken from the Ricking Connection curriculum, include:
There are also many ways the agency can help workers fight VT and remain hopeful.
Hope is an essential element of every moment of our work. In fact, our work defines hope – we embody a conviction that people can heal and change. We have seen it happen many times. As we are presented with each new scared, snarly, withdrawn, obnoxious, or difficult client, it is our job to shine with the hope of all that they can become.
In conclusion, RICH© relationships are the key to healing, and forming and enhancing them is central to our work. This is not easy. There are many dilemmas. Recognizing these, being aware when they arise, reframing, talking with our supervisor and team, and being thoughtful about what we do are crucial to our success. Through RICH relationships we do the essential and heart-warming work of healing trauma survivors.
Join LaVerne Baker Hotep and Patricia Wilcox, LCSW, today at 3 p.m. ET to learn more about how R.I.C.H. relationships are healing relationships.